Updated on 21 February 2023
This comparison is certified 100% impartial and follows our selection process.
Despite its heavy weight, the Dyad stands out from its competitors thanks to its brush equipped with 3 rollers, which enables it to offer rather impressive cleaning performance.
Roborock Dyad
Overall, the Roborock Dyad performed very well in our test. We found the tanks (620 and 850 ml) easy to handle, as well as the display which shows very precise information. Although it is penalised by its heavy weight (5,8 kg), which makes it difficult to move from one room to another, it is fortunately self-propelled to facilitate its use. It also lacks a parking mode. We appreciated its effectiveness in the kitchen as well as in the dining room, and the speed of drying (5 to 10 minutes) after its use. However, its performance would be even better with the corresponding cleaning product. Maintenance is facilitated by the self-cleaning system of the roller on the station, the presence of a filter in the dirty water tank and the cleaning brush supplied with the appliance. However, it is quite noisy (75 dB in use and 85 dB during self-cleaning). With about 35 minutes, it has a good battery life. It is a well-designed and very convincing device.
These devices offer, on paper, the promise of combining vacuuming and mopping.
A well-designed handle, with easy-to-reach buttons, makes the task much easier.
The water flow and power should, ideally, be adjustable.
The tanks are usually two: one for clean water, the other for dirty one.
For maintenance, a small cleaning brush is often provided and proves to be quite handy.
Tineco Floor One S5 Pro+
Quieter and lighter than the other models we tested, this wet and dry vacuum cleaner is a good ally for efficiently sucking up spilt liquids and cleaning thoroughly thanks to its electrolysis function.
During our tests, we used all 4 modes of operation and validated them all. Indeed, the Auto mode managed to detect, increase the power and efficiently suck up an egg (even the shell) and ketchup. The Max mode proved relevant with a larger amount to clean and the Succion mode managed to absorb all the spilt milk. However, while it managed to suck up the smallest of dirt (such as breadcrumbs), it was not suitable for pet owners as it spread the hair rather than sucking it up. Quiet, we measured that it emitted 70-71dB in operation and only 72dB at times when self-cleaning (compared to 85dB with the Dyad). This self-cleaning is very easy to start with its dedicated button, but lasts a little longer than with other models (about 2 minutes 30). As for the operating time, it is around 35 minutes, allowing to clean easily 50 m² in depth for 4 to 5 hours of recharge. Finally, its application was complex to install via 2.4GHz Wi-Fi and with mobile data deactivated.
Dreame H11 Max
The strength of this model lies in its Automatic mode, which adapts its operation to the degree of dirtiness of the floor. All of this is indicated in real time by the circular screen and its coloured ring.
Quite intuitive and well designed, the Dreame H11 Max has a large clean water tank (900ml) and a smaller dirty water tank (500ml). During our tests, we found the information on the screen very clear and the wheel drive system limits the effort required, although the device is quite heavy (4,5 kg). On the other hand, it has the advantage of being able to stand on its own and to automatically clean the roller once it is installed on its storage station. Finally, its washing performance is very satisfactory, even if we would have preferred to improve it with detergent (not recommended by the brand). It managed to quickly suck up all kinds of small and medium-sized waste, while cleaning the floor of the most visible marks. The Auto mode adapted the power well according to the degree of dirt on the floor. However, it leaves the floor very wet behind and it takes 10-15 minutes before it is dry again.
Our selection
Our choice, Best mid-range Best high-end Mid-range alternative Roborock Dyad Tineco Floor One S5 Pro+ Dreame H11 Max Despite its heavy weight, the Dyad stands out from its competitors thanks to its brush equipped with 3 rollers, which enables it to offer rather impressive cleaning performance. Quieter and lighter than the other models we tested, this wet and dry vacuum cleaner is a good ally for efficiently sucking up spilt liquids and cleaning thoroughly thanks to its electrolysis function. The strength of this model lies in its Automatic mode, which adapts its operation to the degree of dirtiness of the floor. All of this is indicated in real time by the circular screen and its coloured ring. £ 443.94 on AliExpress £ 629.00 on Amazon £ 430.05 on Amazon
Selectos compares and tests hundreds of products to help you buy better. We sometimes receive a commission when you buy through our links, which helps fund our work. Learn moreWhy trust us ?
How did we test?
Each test started with an evaluation of the overall design of the appliance: weight and handling of the hoover, its tanks, ease of use of the different modes offered… As well as an overview of the accessories provided.
To evaluate the performance as realistically as possible, we used each device in real-life conditions, during our daily cleaning in various rooms of the house (dining room, kitchen, bathroom). We then carried out specific tests in our recording studio: spilt juice and cereal, dropped eggs, sauce stains, etc. We have always concluded our tests with a thorough maintenance of each hoover.
How to choose a wet & dry vacuum cleaner ?
Recently introduced to the market, floor cleaners offer, in theory, the promise of replacing hoovers and mops with a single 2-in-1 device, capable of collecting solid and liquid waste in a single pass.
However, their still limited number does not make the choice easy. To make sure you make the best possible purchase, we have listed the key criteria to help you choose.
- The ergonomy: it should be noted that this type of device is quite heavy, which can create discomfort during the various manipulations. Therefore, a well-designed handle with easy-to-reach buttons and self-driving wheels can make the task much easier.
- The modes of use and water flow: while some models are reserved for cleaning hard floors, others are compatible with carpets and rugs. Therefore, the water flow rate and power should ideally be adjustable to suit the degree of dirt and the type of surface being cleaned. Finally, some machines are able to dry the floor directly after washing, for a real 3-in-1 effect.
- The tanks: there are usually 2 of them, one for clean water, the other for dirty water. The larger they are, the longer you can clean, but ideally they should also be easily accessible for filling and emptying.
- The ease of maintenance: this involves the maintenance of the tanks on the one hand and the brushes on the other. Most often, a small multi-functional cleaning brush is provided and is very practical. Some storage stations also offer a self-cleaning system for the rollers, which rotate at high speed and use the water in the tank.
Other machines we recommend
Tineco iFLOOR 2 (£239.00 upon publication): a very light and cheap alternative. Weighing just 3.5kg, this is one of the lightest models we have tested. It is cheap and makes therefore some concessions by not including a display and by offering only two modes of operation. Normal mode is indicated by a steady blue light and Stain mode flashes this light while adding more water. In practice, we did not notice much difference between these two modes in our tests, but both were quite effective with most stains to be cleaned. However, it is not suitable for cleaning finer or more encrusted dirt. In terms of battery life, we were able to use it for just over 25 minutes (22 minutes advertised), which puts it in the lower half of the mid-range and it takes 4-5 hours to charge.
Bissel CrossWave C3 Pro (£329.99 upon publication): a wired model for continuous operating time. Admittedly, we found that the power cable was a bit of a hindrance to the ergonomics during our tests. However, with its 7 m length, there is still room for improvement. It performs well with all liquids (even sweeter, thicker or fatty ones), but it is a bit lacking when it comes to larger or more solids. In the end, it is its less efficient self-cleaning system and its high noise level combined with a lower quality/price ratio that put it off our main selection.
Ultenic AC1 (£359.99 upon publication): a second mid-range solution. With 1L tanks for clean and dirty water, this model is practical to use. Quite heavy (5 kg), it is self-propelled, making it easy to handle. In our tests, its four modes of operation (Smart, Max, Sterilisation and Succion) proved to be effective. It can clean and vacuum all kinds of liquids or thicker foods (ketchup, milk, crumbs, eggs), but also sticky or encrusted stains. In addition, it has an interesting operating time of 45 minutes. Nevertheless, it is quite noisy with 76 dB in Max mode and a self-cleaning that rises to 75 dB.
Other machines tested
Vileda JetClean (£262.58 upon publication): During our test, we found this model to be rather inefficient and unergonomic. Between its telescopic handle that can be unclipped, its wire that hinders movement and its ability to only really suck up liquids (not too greasy, not too thick and without solids), it doesn’t leave a very good impression…
Redkey W12 (£329.99 upon publication): Despite a price that can be considered attractive for this type of product, the Redkey W12 did not live up to our expectations. Its washing performance is not up to the level of its competitors and makes its usefulness frankly questionable, a flaw that cannot be compensated for by its design, which itself could be improved.
Proscenic F20 (£299.00 upon publication): Very good in practice, this wet and dry vacuum cleaner was efficient for most of the tasks we gave it. However, we were unable to charge it properly as it stopped charging after a while. This may be an isolated defect, but we preferred to leave it out until we had tested another model.
Dreame H12 (£515.86 upon publication): Although its performance was good, it failed to tackle the tougher stains. In addition, its auto mode only worked more or less correctly with liquids and not with the more solid dirt that requires water. Finally, it is very noisy.
Philips AquaTrio Wet & Dry wireless serie 9000 (£849.99 upon publication): With its many accessories, this 3-in-1 wet and dry vacuum cleaner looked like a good deal. Unfortunately, our tests proved the opposite: less efficient than other models that are half the price, a disappointing 26 minutes of operating time, and below average water tanks.
Translated by Laura Wautier
